From the last decision
to the next one.
Reconstruct what happened. Diagnose where judgment broke. Get a recommended path forward, backed by industry research.
The Decision Instance.
Every past decision becomes one structured record. Who decided, what, why and what else. Each part linked to its source.
Four evidence tiers.
Four ways judgment breaks.
Established
Stated in a primary record.
Strongly Inferred
Several sources agree.
Weakly Inferred
One informal source suggests it.
Unknown
Not in any record. We say so.
Where did judgment break?
A clear way
back on track.
For every gap, Groach sets out options to recover, compares their trade-offs and recommends one. Your team decides.
- PrioritisedRanked by risk, urgency and effort.
- Suggested ownerEvery step has someone to own it.
- TimingWhen to act, tied to renewals and reviews.
- Options and trade-offsCost, time and resilience, side by side.
- Evidence behind itLinked to the gap it closes and the research it rests on.
The post-implementation review lists the exit plan as a dependency, but no record names an owner.
Context from
beyond your walls.
Groach looks at how peers handled similar decisions, what regulators expect and what the market is signalling. Findings are sourced and tiered, just like your own records.
How comparable companies approached the same call.
Guidance and expectations that bear on the decision.
Shifts in pricing, competition and supply that change the odds.
Close the loop.
Follow each action to its outcome. What you learn becomes evidence for the next decision.
Machines advise.
People decide.
MAI runs several reasoning passes over the same record. One builds, one challenges, one checks every source, one advises. Where they disagree, you see it.
Never silently
rewritten.
Your records
stay yours.
Questions.
Does Groach make decisions for us?
No. Groach recommends options with their evidence and trade-offs. Your team decides, and the record shows who approved what.
Where does the industry research come from?
Public sources such as company filings, published regulatory guidance and analyst commentary. Every finding shows its source and carries an evidence tier.
Do teams need to change how they decide?
No. Groach starts from records you already keep, so it's useful before anyone changes a habit.
How is this different from an AI summary?
A summary says what documents contain. Groach says what was decided, how well each part is supported, what's missing, and what to do next.
What if the evidence is thin?
We mark it Unknown, flag it as a critical gap when it matters, and recommend how to close it.